_____________________________________________________________________
LEAD Action News Volume 22 Number 4 December 2024 Page 29 of 131
Inexplicably, EPA’s action came less than two weeks after CDC’s Lead Exposure Prevention Advisory
Committee (LEPAC) adopted a draft report that specifically identified lead wheel weights as an
unnecessary use because there were feasible, safer alternatives. EPA’s representative on LEPAC voted
for report. See our blog regarding LEPAC’s action.
The report noted that many states have already adopted a ban, and it recommended that the federal
government and other states do the same. Among the nine states—California, Illinois, Maine,
Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Vermont, and Washington—that already have a ban in
place, six have been in effect for more than a dozen years.
In addition, EPA’s analysis3 failed to consider the risks to adults, especially those who handle lead
wheel weights in tire repair shops, despite the evidence provided by commenters. The omission
is strange because the agency knows how significant the socioeconomic benefits of reducing adult lead
exposure can be. To justify two major October rulemakings to reduce lead in drinking water and
dust in homes, EPA quantified the risks of death from cardiovascular disease (CVD) and of low birth
weights when adults are exposed to lead. The CVD benefits were huge, similar to or greater than the
IQ benefits from reducing children’s lead exposure.
Why it Matters
In 2009, in response to a TSCA citizen petition,4 EPA agreed to take action on lead wheel
weights, recognizing that state action showed there were safer alternatives, but that a national rule was
needed to effectively remove the materials from the market.
In 2014, a Tire Review article said, “Weight manufacturers and distributors alike agree that a
complete ban on lead wheel weights would be beneficial to everyone. It would allow producers to focus
on making only one product; distributors could reduce their stock levels; and any national companies
would have to worry about only one set of laws.” Unfortunately, despite the anticipated benefits, the
market has not on its own fully moved away from lead wheel weights.
After 14 years of EPA’s inaction, the petitioners went to court to force EPA to make a decision. As
a result, EPA agreed to decide whether to initiate rulemaking to regulate lead wheel weights.
The delay appears to have been costly because the petitioners’ comments showed that EPA’s
inaction resulted in significantly greater production of lead wheel weights, reversing years of decline.
They also said that:
• The cost of steel wheel weights are roughly the same as lead;
• The world’s largest retailers—Walmart and Amazon—sell lead wheel weights;
• Lead wheel weights are available online, even in states with a ban; and
• 25 million pounds of lead has fallen from vehicles since EPA granted the 2009 petition.
Our Take
For an agency and an Administration clearly committed to protecting people from lead exposure,
EPA’s action makes little sense, especially since final action under a TSCA comprehensive review may
well be a decade away. EPA’s failure to consider the evidence of adult exposure, especially from people
who replace tires and add wheel weights to rebalance the new tire, leaves its decision vulnerable to a
legal challenge.
On a personal level, Unleaded Kids’ Tom Neltner recalls many of his pre-teen years spent collecting
lead wheel weights that had fallen off car tires and then melting them down into toys—and even gifts