_____________________________________________________________________
LEAD Action News Volume 22 Number 4 December 2024 Page 25 of 131
CDC’s LEPAC Calls for Groundbreaking Action to
Protect Adults from Lead
Blog originally published on 16th Dec 2024 at https://unleadedkids.org/lepac-action-to-protect-
adults/2024/12/16/ and reprinted with kind permission of Tom Neltner.
HEALTH RIS KS
Pixabay/cegoh
What Happened
At a December 11 meeting, CDC’s
Lead Exposure Prevention Advisory
Committee (LEPAC) adopted an
impressive draft report that calls for
measures to protect adults from the
harmful effects of lead exposure.1 The
report makes 16 groundbreaking
recommendations with detailed
justifications for each.
Key drivers for action were the
recognition that lead exposure is a
cardiovascular risk factor on par with
high cholesterol, smoking, and high
blood pressure and that risk “has
received relatively sparse attention in
health professional education and
outreach to the lay public.” LEPAC was
also concerned about lead’s risk to both
pregnant people and their fetuses.
The magnitude of lead-related risk is on par with that of other prominent
cardiovascular risk factors, such as elevated cholesterol, smoking, and
hypertension, that have been the focus of extensive public health concern.
FROM TH E LEPAC DRAFT REPORT
In October, EPA quantified the benefits of reducing lead-related cardiovascular disease mortality when
it finalized two major rules that tightened dust lead action levels and mandated removal of virtually
_____________________________________________________________________
LEAD Action News Volume 22 Number 4 December 2024 Page 26 of 131
all lead pipes. The estimated benefits for each rule far exceeded the costs of those rules.
The recommendations include:
Recognize and emphasize the cardiovascular disease risk in preventive health policies and
communications; take decisive and consequential actions when adult blood lead levels are at
or above 10 µg/dL.
Combine adult and child blood lead surveillance systems at federal, state, and local levels;
improve national and state Adult Blood Lead Epidemiology and Surveillance (ABLES)
programs, including performance measures, data management, and funding.
Use new California OSHA standards as a model for feasible health protection because the
federal standards fail to protect workers.
Encourage occupational physicians to exercise their discretionary authority to recommend
medical removal and other protective measures at blood lead levels lower than OSHA limits.
Eliminate all unnecessary workplace and commercial uses of lead where substitution of safer
alternative materials is possible and feasible.
Increase compliance with EPA’s Lead-Safe Renovation, Repair and Painting (RRP) rule.
Mandate lead hazard mitigation activities for permits and inspections conducted in
accordance with model codes of the International Code Council.
Offer no-cost blood lead screening to uninsured or low-income adults.
Improve compliance with CDC and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
(ACOG) recommendations for blood lead screening of pregnant people and track success
through healthcare performance measures.
Why it Matters
LEPAC gave seven specific reasons to support its call for action:
“A prominent endpoint of concern is death, as opposed to subtle or subclinical effects on
organ system function that are often sufficient for public health and regulatory action.
“The epidemiological evidence that associates this outcome with lead exposure is derived from
multiple large, high quality prospective cohort studies that extensively controlled for
confounding and bias.
“This epidemiological evidence is coherent with clinical and experimental findings that
demonstrate plausible modes of action at consistent lead doses.
“Because the background risk of cardiovascular mortality in populations with this ongoing
extent of lead exposure (largely but not exclusively in the workplace) is high, the absolute
increase in mortality may be substantial.”
“The magnitude of lead-related risk is on par with that of other prominent cardiovascular risk
factors, such as elevated cholesterol, smoking, and hypertension, that have been the focus of
extensive public health concern.”
“Levels of chronic adult lead exposure linked to this risk remain prevalent in many workplace
settings.
_____________________________________________________________________
LEAD Action News Volume 22 Number 4 December 2024 Page 27 of 131
“The observed risk of cardiovascular mortality associated with blood lead concentrations 10
µg/dL does not establish the absence of risk at lower blood lead concentrations.”
Our Take
We fully support LEPAC’s recommendations to CDC and encourage the agency to act with urgency
given the risks. The two years LEPAC invested in the comprehensive report was worth the wait.
We also encourage all who seek to protect people from lead to consider the recommendations now
and not to wait for federal action. These state, local, and private actions will serve as models to help
the federal government to act when it is able.
Unleaded Kids also asked CDC to:
Encouraged CDC to closely review ACOG’s risk factors because they have not been validated
and are hard to apply in practice even for folks knowledgeable on issue.
Finalize its Lead Exposure Risk Index presented by CDC at a December 2021 LEPAC meeting
so drinking water utilities could add it to their maps of lead service lines to avoid the
misperception that lead pipes are the sole or primary source of lead
exposure. Indiana and California have their own helpful examples.
Encourage rather than discourage data sharing with EPA and HUD so they can take action to
protect families from lead.
Consider redefining the Blood Lead Reference Value as anaction levelas other federal
agencies have done for dust-lead, food, water, and workplaces. This approach would better
describe the purpose of the BLRV and be consistent with other agencies, making it easier to
communicate.
1. LEPAC approved the report but asked the workgroup that wrote the report to clarify three
areas: 1) reference EPA analysis to support lead in water and dust rules that quantified the
health benefits of reducing adult exposure to lead in terms of fewer cardiovascular disease
deaths, and fewer low birth weights; 2) drop call to link clinical lab certification to compliance
with state-mandated blood lead reporting requirements; and 3) include local agencies
increasing compliance with lead-safe renovation, repair, and painting rule.
_______________________________________________________________________________________