ILPPWA Report 2020 from Eco-Accord, Russia
Ф
LEAD
IN PAINT MATERIALS:
FOR HUMAN HEALTH AND
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Webinar, October 26, 2020
Summary of the discussion
The webinar was attended by 38 participants representing the Russian governmental agencies, the
Eurasian Economic Commission (EAEC), Russian paint manufactures, and NGOs from Eastern
Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (EECCA) region. The aim of the meeting was to discuss the
current situation of the development and approval of the Technical Regulations "On the Safety of
Paints " of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU); analyze challenges and opportunities for its
adoption and enforcement; and agree on ways forward.
Olga Speranskaya, IPEN / Eco-Accord, described the activities of the International Pollutants
Elimination Network (IPEN) in monitoring lead in paint in various countries and the work to develop
legislation to ban lead in paint. Since 2008, 59 countries have been involved in IPEN's campaign to
eliminate lead in paint, including 9 out of 12 countries in Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia.
Over 3,500 paint samples have been analysed. The results showed the presence of lead in at least 30% of
paint samples taken from each of the participating countries. According to Olga Speranskaya, a WHO
legislative study, shows that lead paints are still used in many countries despite the global goal of phasing
out these paints by 2020. As of 31 May 2020, 39% of countries confirmed that they had legally binding
controls over lead paints. However, many of these regulations are not sufficiently protective as they
contain exemptions, weak restrictions or are not enforced.
Mr.Kanagat Dyusambaev, chief expert of the Ministry of Development and Investments of the
Republic of Kazakhstan, spoke about the development of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU)
Technical Regulations "On the safety of paints". At the last discussion sessions of this document, which
took place on 2 and 8 October 2020, the main unresolved issues were lead in paint and the use of volatile
organic compounds. It is proposed to use the standard lead content of 90 ppm (0, 009%), as
recommended by WHO and the authorized bodies in the health sector of Kazakhstan. All EAEU
countries, except Russia, agree with this. Some Russian government agencies and industry still have
questions about why 90 ppm is proposed, as well as concerns that the transition to the new standards will
require major changes in production technology. The length of the period required for transition to the
new regulations is also a discussion issue. It was agreed that the Russian Federal Service for Surveillance
on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor) would present its official
position and that the Russian paint and varnish industry would also justify its position. It is expected that
the next meeting on the Technical Regulations will develop an agreed position on this issue - and this
meeting is likely to be the final one.
Dr. Khalidya Khamidulina, Director of the Russian Register of Potentially Hazardous Chemical and
Biological Substances. (Russian Register) of the Russian Federal Service for Surveillance on
Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor) noted that the last discussion of
the draft Technical Regulations "On the safety of paints" looked "unconstructive and unsightly". She
expressed hope that both regulatory authorities and business would finally understand that Russia and the
EUEU will still switch to the 0.009% (90 ppm) lead content in paints and varnishes.
An important issue is how long the transition period to the new standard will last. Rospotrebnadzor has
set a strict period of 24 months, with a maximum of 36 months. Besides, the Technical Regulations on
Safety of Paints cannot come into force before the end of 2022. Therefore, we have enough time - at least
two years + 36 months, and a lot can be done during this period. We cannot stretch the process for
decades. Just a small number of manufacturers in Russia still use lead. Most paints on the Russian market
contains no lead.
"We are sounding the alarm, as we have a sad example of the implementation of the Rotterdam
Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in
International Trade, for which Rospotrbnadzor is responsible and for which the Russian Register is a
special authorized body," Kh.Khamidulina stressed. - We see how many substances that are banned or
severely restricted in the EU, China, Serbia and other countries around the world enter the Russian
market for the simple reason that we do not regulate these chemicals in any way. It is easier to regulate
pesticide import because we have a state catalogue of permitted pesticides which forms the base for
import or import ban of certain pesticides. The situation is more complicated with industrial chemicals,
so we are slowly turning into a dumping ground for chemicals that are not used in other countries but that
are imported to Russia at low price. It is more expensive for these other countries to destroy prohibited
substances than to sell them at dumping prices to the Russian Federation. According to the Director of
the Russian Registry, lead pigments and paints banned in other countries will be imported to countries
where these products are allowed. Therefore, as Khamidulina stressed, we have deep concerns that we
could become a lead paint dump.
Earlier, during the discussion of lead-related regulations, many questions were raised about how lead in
paint could be controlled. Kh.Khamidulina noted that this problem is now being solved. At the initiative
of the Russian Register, the development of guidelines for the control of lead in paint has been included
in the Plan for the development of regulatory and methodological documents of Rospotrebnadzor for the
next year. Thus, by the time the implementation of technical regulations begins, the document will be
approved. If it is necessary to formalize it as an interstate standard (GOST), the Russian Register is ready
to do so.
Mr. Sergei Fedotov, President of the Russian Paint Quality Association (RPQA) noted with
satisfaction that the issues of the content of the Technical Regulations "On the Safety of Paints",
including the regulation of lead in paint, began to be discussed widely, with the participation of all
stakeholders, while a year ago this was not the case.
He emphasized that the experience of companies that are members of the Paint Quality Association
shows that if lead chromates or lead siccative are not intentionally added to the formulation, the lead
concentration in paint will be less than 90 ppm. However, in his opinion, there are several problems here,
the main of which is the difficulty of controlling the quality of raw materials for small and medium-sized
enterprises, which form the basis of the Russian paint industry: while the RPQA member companies are
large enough and have their own well-equipped laboratories, hundreds of small decorative paint
companies do not have the financial or human resources to test the incoming raw materials for lead
content. According to Fedotov, these companies are unable to effectively conduct the quality control of
raw materials and cannot obtain information on the content of lead and other ingredients in raw materials
supplied from South-East Asia, Western Europe and North America. The documents accompanying the
raw materials for paint manufacturing often do not contain this information. After all, if testing the end
product reveals an increased lead content, this is blamed on small paint manufacturers, whereas in reality
it is the result of a poor quality control system for the raw material, which allows for the import of lead-
contaminated components. According to Fedotov, this not only concerns lead, but also volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) and formaldehyde.
Another important problem, according to Fedotov, is related to lab methods for determining lead in paint.
The existing methods in Russia allow lead to be determined with an accuracy of 0.05%. Therefore,
during the transition period, the industry initially proposed to set the standard for lead content at 0.05%
(500 ppm), so that the standard could be changed to 0.009% later. Although there are examples in Russia
of using precise methods to determine 0.009% lead in paint (for example, in the Yaroslavl laboratory),
this method is unqualified, so it cannot be used for mass product control. The good news, according to
Fedotov, is that accurate methods for determining lead in paint will soon be developed by
Rospotrebnadzor. Another question, he noted, is how long and how much time and capital investment it
will take to provide all regional centres with the necessary equipment. This is not an easy task and there
is doubt that it will be done in 36 months. But if we have outlined this path, we must follow it.
Mr. Gennady Averyanov, President of the Tsentrlak Association, one of the oldest associations of
paint and varnish industry enterprises, believes that Russia has had a coherent system of market
regulation for paints and varnishes, which includes Unified Sanitary Requirements, GOSTs and Sanitary
Regulations, and is currently developing the EAEU Technical Regulations on the safety of paint. The
standard for lead content in paints and varnishes is quite high (5000 ppm), and our enterprises work as
Rospotrebnadzor allows us to.
In Averyanov's opinion, the paint and varnish industry is not against tightening the standards to better
address the content of harmful substances in paint. However, Tsentralak believes that such tightening
should not lead to the collapse of the industry. The industry consists of approximately 1,500 companies,
which is 70% of the companies in countries of the Eurasian Economic Union. If regulation is improved
through shock therapy, companies go bankrupt and budget contributions will become less.
Averyanov believes that the situations in the paint and varnish industry in Russia differs from the
situation in Europe and the USA where giant paint manufacturers are located. Russian enterprises are not
represented in the Global Lead Paint Alliance and the recommendations of the Alliance are not suitable
for the Russian paint industry. According to Averyanov, the Model Law does not reflect the specifics of
Russian situation - there are analysts from Africa, Asia and the Caribbean, but not from our country. We
do not know if our paints really affect the health of our people and children. According to materials
provided by the Alliance, dry paint can crumble and sneak into dust, which can enter the body of a child.
But we have no proof that toys painted with our colours can poison children even if they suck on them.
Averyanov also noted, that according to GAELP not all countries accepted the 90ppm standard . This
standard varies from 100 ppm to 600 ppm in some countries.
For this reason, Tsentrlak proposes to accept 500 ppm of lead content in paints and make it the EAEU
standard. This standard, which is 10 times lower than today, has been agreed by Tsentrlak with the Paint
Quality Association and can be controlled using existing control capabilities in Russia.
A.V.Averyanov echoed concerns about the quality of raw materials for the paint industry, which may
contain lead. He noted that tougher regulations on lead will lead to market redistribution in favour of
imported pigments from the EU and the USA, the cost of which is approximately 6 times higher than that
of pigments from BRICS countries. Meanwhile, we now have 70% of raw materials from the BRICS
countries and 30% from the EU.
Analysis conducted by Centrallak shows that 90 ppm standard of lead content in paint will be a shock to
the Russian paint industry: companies will not be able to control the compliance, there are no methods,
equipment and lab specialists available. In the meantime, the costs of the final products will increase, and
their competitiveness will decrease. According to Averyanov, the Rospotrebnadzor system also has little
control over the market. It is therefore necessary to approve the 500 ppm standard at this time, while
stricter standards will be applied at a later stage when all necessary technical prerequisites will be met.
G.V.Averyanov expressed no concern about the flooding of the Russian market with lead-contaminated
paint. In his opinion, the share of imported materials in the Russian paint and varnish market is only 10-
15%. They belong to the high-value goods segment and are imported mainly from European countries
where they are produced in accordance with European standards.
Mr. Pavel Filatkin, Deputy Director of the Department of Chemical and Technological Complex
and Bioengineering Technologies of the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation,
said that he conceptually shared Centrallak's concerns. In his opinion, 1,500 paint and varnish industry
enterprises provide jobs and pay taxes to the budget. Therefore, by taking radical steps, we can do more
harm than help.
In Filatkin's opinion, the Ministry of Industry and Trade does not deny the importance of environmental
issues, human safety, and environmental protection; nobody argues with this. The only question is not to
apply any measures drastically, not to hit the development of the industry, but to go through transitional
periods, the duration of which can be discussed, to find consensus. Even in Europe, the transition to the
new standards takes considerable time.
Filatkin reminded that on 2 October 2020 the Government of the Russian Federation approved the
National Action Plan to ensure the restoration of employment and income, economic growth and long-
term structural changes in the economy. In this document there is a special section devoted to the
postponement of entry into force of normative legal acts in the sphere of technical regulation. As Filatkin
explained, this is due to the fact that the Government understands that in the current situation it is not
quite right to make any sharp moves to tighten requirements. Therefore, the representative of the
Ministry of Economy agrees with industry representatives that it is necessary to approach this issue very
carefully and, of course, transition periods are necessary.
Olga Ponizova, Eco-Accord, said that Eco-Accord Center in its activities is guided by the concept of
sustainable development and the need to harmonize the ecological, social and economic spheres. Olga
Ponizova told about the results of oil paint testing conducted by Eco-Accord in 2016 in cooperation with
IPEN and in 2020 with the support of the Russian Presidential Grant. In both cases, about 60% of the
paints contained lead in concentrations above 90 ppm. She spoke about the recommendations of non-
governmental organizations to address the problem of lead in paint.
In the discussion, Olga Speranskaya commented on the control of the quality of children's goods by
Rospotrebndzor. She spoke about the research conducted by the Eco-Accord, which revealed significant
heavy metal contamination of children's toys purchased in Russia. She noted that lead concentration in
some toy samples was several times higher than the corresponding Russian standards.
Gennady Averyanov expressed regret that, in his opinion, non-governmental organisations do not hear
industry concerns. Meanwhile, in his opinion, it is necessary to know the production process and listen to
the industry representatives, because a doctor cannot cure a patient without knowing his body. He
suggested going down to earth and building the relationships with industries that fill the budget, provide
employment and produce good quality paints. If someone violates the law, such producers must be fined
by Rospotrebnadzor. The percentage of violations that are recorded is relatively small. Deviations can be
found in products of any group. In his opinion, if we do a study on paint quality in Europe or America,
there will also be deviations. Averyanov suggested to better understand the paint industry and people
who work there, and not to agrue with those companies that work well and produce high-quality paints.
According to G.V.Averyanov, there are potboilers in all countries, but it is necessary to follow an
evolutionary path, not a revolutionary one. "We survived 1917, we survived the 1990s, when everything
stopped," said Averyanov, and we do not need such shocks anymore".
Sergey Fedotov supported the idea that other countries’ standards and rules not always fall on our soil,
and this is a reflection of the fact that we do not take part in the development of these rules.
He stressed that the Technical Regulations are just one of the links in the chain for regulating lead in
paint. A quality control system for raw materials needs to be put in place that small businesses themselves
are unable to implement - perhaps by creating a register of hazardous chemicals where they all need to be
registered. Everything that is imported must have absolutely clear information about the composition of
raw materials. According to Sуrgey Fedotov, any norms can be adopted, but they need to be fulfilled.
In response to comments about the non-participation of Russian industry representatives in the Global
Alliance to EliminateLead Paint, Olga Speranskaya noted that participation in the Global Alliance is not
limited - on the contrary, it is in every possible way encouraged, but the participation of Russian
industrial associations is not yet visible. Gennady Averyanov raised the question of why the Russian
industry should participate in the Alliance at all. Olga Ponizova noted that that the representatives of the
Russian paint manufacturers do not use the opportunity to participate in international meetings to discuss
lead paint elimination. Thus, they did not even respond to UNEP's invitation in March 2019 to take part in
a workshop on this topic for Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia held in Almaty and lost an
excellent opportunity to learn about the work of the Alliance and provide input to the international
discussions.
Khalidya Khamidulina considers it necessary to maintain a balance between the need to develop the
economy, preserve jobs and protect the health of the population. She urged to tackle the problem
constructively, introduce transitional periods, strive for better standards, and seek compromise on these
issues.
Vladislava Minakova, JSC Hempel, noted that if there are mineral components in the paintwork
materials, they may contain lead. Hempel manufactures anti-corrosive primers that are paintable and do
not directly affect human health. Vladislav Minakova urged Rospotrebnadzor to consider the differences
in paints by purpose and type of use.
Oleg Speranskaya spoke about the analytical note just published by WHO that discusses the impact of
lead in paint on the health of people, children and pregnant women and promised to distribute this
material as soon as possible.
Pavel Filatkin noted that in our country there is a huge number of support measures for business, and the
Ministry of Industry and Trade is open to proposals on this topic.
According to Olga Ponizova, the transition to the production of lead-free paint is inevitable, and this will
increase the competitiveness of the Russian industry both domestically and internationally.
All the participants in the discussion expressed high appreciation of the event and agreed that such a
dialogue is very important for all stakeholders. It is important to listen and hear each other and be able to
find a compromise.