product reveals an increased lead content, this is blamed on small paint manufacturers, whereas in reality
it is the result of a poor quality control system for the raw material, which allows for the import of lead-
contaminated components. According to Fedotov, this not only concerns lead, but also volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) and formaldehyde.
Another important problem, according to Fedotov, is related to lab methods for determining lead in paint.
The existing methods in Russia allow lead to be determined with an accuracy of 0.05%. Therefore,
during the transition period, the industry initially proposed to set the standard for lead content at 0.05%
(500 ppm), so that the standard could be changed to 0.009% later. Although there are examples in Russia
of using precise methods to determine 0.009% lead in paint (for example, in the Yaroslavl laboratory),
this method is unqualified, so it cannot be used for mass product control. The good news, according to
Fedotov, is that accurate methods for determining lead in paint will soon be developed by
Rospotrebnadzor. Another question, he noted, is how long and how much time and capital investment it
will take to provide all regional centres with the necessary equipment. This is not an easy task and there
is doubt that it will be done in 36 months. But if we have outlined this path, we must follow it.
Mr. Gennady Averyanov, President of the Tsentrlak Association, one of the oldest associations of
paint and varnish industry enterprises, believes that Russia has had a coherent system of market
regulation for paints and varnishes, which includes Unified Sanitary Requirements, GOSTs and Sanitary
Regulations, and is currently developing the EAEU Technical Regulations on the safety of paint. The
standard for lead content in paints and varnishes is quite high (5000 ppm), and our enterprises work as
Rospotrebnadzor allows us to.
In Averyanov's opinion, the paint and varnish industry is not against tightening the standards to better
address the content of harmful substances in paint. However, Tsentralak believes that such tightening
should not lead to the collapse of the industry. The industry consists of approximately 1,500 companies,
which is 70% of the companies in countries of the Eurasian Economic Union. If regulation is improved
through shock therapy, companies go bankrupt and budget contributions will become less.
Averyanov believes that the situations in the paint and varnish industry in Russia differs from the
situation in Europe and the USA where giant paint manufacturers are located. Russian enterprises are not
represented in the Global Lead Paint Alliance and the recommendations of the Alliance are not suitable
for the Russian paint industry. According to Averyanov, the Model Law does not reflect the specifics of
Russian situation - there are analysts from Africa, Asia and the Caribbean, but not from our country. We
do not know if our paints really affect the health of our people and children. According to materials
provided by the Alliance, dry paint can crumble and sneak into dust, which can enter the body of a child.
But we have no proof that toys painted with our colours can poison children even if they suck on them.
Averyanov also noted, that according to GAELP not all countries accepted the 90ppm standard . This
standard varies from 100 ppm to 600 ppm in some countries.
For this reason, Tsentrlak proposes to accept 500 ppm of lead content in paints and make it the EAEU
standard. This standard, which is 10 times lower than today, has been agreed by Tsentrlak with the Paint
Quality Association and can be controlled using existing control capabilities in Russia.
A.V.Averyanov echoed concerns about the quality of raw materials for the paint industry, which may
contain lead. He noted that tougher regulations on lead will lead to market redistribution in favour of
imported pigments from the EU and the USA, the cost of which is approximately 6 times higher than that
of pigments from BRICS countries. Meanwhile, we now have 70% of raw materials from the BRICS
countries and 30% from the EU.
Analysis conducted by Centrallak shows that 90 ppm standard of lead content in paint will be a shock to
the Russian paint industry: companies will not be able to control the compliance, there are no methods,
equipment and lab specialists available. In the meantime, the costs of the final products will increase, and
their competitiveness will decrease. According to Averyanov, the Rospotrebnadzor system also has little
control over the market. It is therefore necessary to approve the 500 ppm standard at this time, while